As more and more advisors come to understand the compelling investment case for dedicating a portion of client portfolios to life settlements (the short answer: double-digit targeted returns that are largely uncorrelated with financial markets at a time when many investors are looking to diversify), the inevitable next question is where those assets fit in a portfolio allocation framework. Previously the exclusive province of large institutions, life settlements are increasingly accessible to qualified individual investors. But for advisors to help their clients take advantage of these and other private debt opportunities, they first need to understand how to characterize them in the context of a financial plan.
Practices vary, with some financial planners placing life settlement investments into a “general alternatives,” or “alternative fixed income” bucket, or even a hedge fund allocation, while others assign them to the insurance linked securities sleeve that might also include catastrophe bonds. That may make sense in some contexts, but because of their return profile and because the underlying policies are a contractual repayment obligation, life settlements are most accurately characterized as private credit. Private credit is defined by Cambridge Associates as a sub-category of private debt that excludes investment-grade and high-yield bonds. Alternative investments like life settlements may address the inefficiencies of traditional investments (such as high volatility, benchmarking, etc.). Therefore, they fit outside or in between traditional allocations.
Understanding why life settlement investments best fit into the private credit allocation can help advisors and their clients better understand the unique and compelling characteristics of these assets and is worth exploring in greater detail.
The growing popularity of private debt
As it turns out, advisors allocating to private debt are in some illustrious company. It has always been a compelling portfolio diversification investment, but the category’s popularity exploded when institutional investors moved to fill the void after traditional lenders were squeezed out of the market by restrictive banking regulations put in place after the credit crisis. According to Preqin, the private debt market has more than doubled to more than $812 billion globally over the last decade.
This increased demand is attributed to falling returns on offer from traditional fixed-income products such as government bonds and the more recent view that traditional corporate credit investments may be overbought.
The rotation into private debt shows little sign of slowing down and appears especially robust in one especially hot corner of the market, private credit. Some 98% of institutional investors recently told Preqin they plan to maintain or increase their allocation to private credit, a sub-class of private debt that includes distressed credit, mezzanine investing, direct lending, and specialty finance.
With so much capital flowing into private debt, it’s fair to ask whether a bubble might be forming. The more correlated segments of the category, which are seen to be more vulnerable to economic shocks and market dislocations, are especially concerning. If public markets undergo a major correction, individual investors and their advisors who are allocating to the strategies or contemplating an allocation would do well to ask whether the private debt and private credit strategies they are considering might follow suit and whether additional diversification within the private debt category might be prudent?
Disparate correlations within private debt and private credit
Private credit allocations are typically meant to serve as a portfolio diversifier by reducing correlation to traditional investments, but not all of the strategies within the sub-class deliver the same level of non-correlation.
Even in “normal markets,” many private credit assets exhibit correlation because spreads on public debt from comparable companies are often used as a basis by which to value the private credit. But when markets gap, correlations can increase even further because many private credit strategies such as mezzanine finance, direct loans, and distressed credit rely on healthy capital markets to achieve a favorable exit. Mezzanine and direct lending, for example, may suffer when credit markets shut down and issuers’ access to refinancing is blocked. And in the distressed market, sharp economic downturns can force fire-sale chapter 7 liquidations where creditors receive cents-on-the-dollar instead of equity in a going concern that they might have received in a chapter 11 bankruptcy scenario.
Nobody minds correlation when all markets are going up. But if investors made allocations into private debt and private credit strategies to soften the impact of market downturns, they may be in for a rude awakening if their specific investments are more correlated than expected when markets inevitably go down.
Enter specialty finance and life settlements
The specialty finance area of private credit, which includes life settlements, litigation finance, healthcare royalties, catastrophe bonds, structured settlements, and aviation finance, is a bit different. Their cashflows may be linked to non-market events – for example, the popularity over time of a movie or music catalog or an act of God like a hurricane season or an earthquake. Also, the assets may be “self-liquidating” and, thus, not reliant on healthy capital markets for an exit.
Life settlements exemplify both features to the hilt, as mortality is not generally correlated to financial markets and liquidity is typically achieved when death benefits are paid out for the underlying policies. (Some life settlement managers may elect to sell certain policies before they mature in a trading strategy, but ultimately that is not required to achieve liquidity.)
No asset in the specialty finance space – or any other investment space that has a secondary market for liquidity is completely uncorrelated to the broader markets due to simple supply and demand factors. Life settlements are no exception. But traditional financial markets risks – credit exposure – are de minimis in the context of the expected 13+% internal rate of return. The far bigger components of risk/drivers of returns in life settlements – getting mortality rates wrong or regulatory issues – have little connection to financial markets and can be effectively controlled by a skillful and experienced manager.
Conclusion
The risk/reward profile of the traditional 60/40 portfolio is declining, making the need for diversification and managing risk increasingly important. As private debt continues to extend beyond institutional investors, wealth advisors and financial advisors will be instrumental in helping investors understand the benefits of incorporating private debt into their portfolios. But as outlined above, not all private debt assets are created equal. Life settlement investing has historically delivered compelling returns with low correlations, giving them the ability to fill the gaps between traditional allocations. Educating investors on the return drivers and risk anatomy of life settlement investments will support the decision to enhance traditional allocations, perhaps most appropriately in the private credit bucket.
DISCLOSURES
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. No assurance can be given that any investment will achieve its objectives or avoid losses. Unless apparent from context, all statements herein represent AIR Asset Management’s opinion.
This article is provided for guidance and information purposes only. Investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed. Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial adviser and/or tax professional before implementing any strategy. This website and information are not intended to provide investment, tax, or legal advice.
AIR Asset Management (“AIRAM”) is an investment adviser registered with the SEC. The information contained in this email is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed by any prospective or existing client (or investor) of AIRAM as a solicitation to effect transactions in securities. In addition, the information herein should not be construed by any prospective or existing client (or investor) of AIRAM as personalized investment advice. AIRAM’s personalized investment advice is given only within the context of its contractual agreements with each client. AIRAM’s investment advice may only be rendered after the delivery of its Form ADV-Part 2A/2B and the execution of an agreement by the client and AIRAM.
Any inferences to AIRAM sponsored and managed investment funds referenced herein are solely intended to provide general information on the investment strategies utilized by AIRAM. The information contained herein is not an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any investment fund sponsored and managed by AIRAM. Any investment decision in connection with such investment funds should be based on the information contained in the Confidential Memorandum and governing documents of the applicable investment fund. Such documents are only available to qualified clients or qualified purchasers with whom AIR has established a relationship in accordance with applicable law.
Illustrative Purposes Only
Examples of our processes and any other ideas presented herein are for illustrative purposes only. There is no guarantee that the Fund will acquire a position in an issuer or industry referenced in such examples or ideas or that any such position would be profitable.
Risk Overview
Management of Operational Risk- In the normal course of business, AIRAM life-settlement funds may be exposed to a variety of operational risks, including position pricing and Net Asset Value calculation procedures, client reporting procedures, compliance controls, and policy acquisition sources. Our managers seek to manage these risks by employing experienced service providers and management who report and manage in accordance with the investment objectives of each fund as outlined in its prospectus. Our approach is to hire the most experienced professionals and firms to add value and protection to our investors.
Longevity Risk- When evaluating the value of life settlements, each policy must be reviewed for multiple quantitative aspects of the insured and their health to get a firm handle on the probability of death over a given timeframe. Understanding the broader implications of these small details within a life settlement transaction is important. One of the key pieces of data used during the underwriting process is the medical underwriting report, which is performed by an independent medical underwriter. Utilizing the latest mortality information, premium data, mortality tables, and verification of coverage, an asset profile is developed and a valuation is produced by an independent valuation agent. A thorough review should then be conducted by a number of parties to create redundancy, and a detailed checklist utilized to ensure uniformity such that all criteria and regulatory requirements correspond to accurate underwriting and quality standards.
Liquidity Risk- Liquidity risk is the risk that a fund may not be able to settle or meet its obligations on time. Investment vehicles are traditionally exposed to quarterly and annual cash redemptions of units at specified amounts. Liquidity risk is managed by investing the majority of the Fund’s assets in investments that can be readily disposed of through various life settlement firms and exchanges. AIRAM utilizes marked-to-market accounting practices within its assets that provide quotations to its fund managers on a regular basis ensuring proper valuations are maintained.
Longevity risk is the biggest quantitative risk factor in the valuing of life settlements. In general, investment managers focus on reducing the economic impact of unexpectedly increased policyholder longevity. In order to ensure this, a fund must review actual versus expected results and stress test different scenarios of mortality expectations in order to determine the impact that these stressed scenarios have on the value of the life settlement. This stress testing is typically performed on the current portfolio as well as on policies available in the market that are being evaluated for purchase. The primary driver of a policy’s sensitivity to longevity risk is the cost of insurance (“COI”). COI increases every year until a mortality event because premiums must be paid to maintain the policy. A policy’s sensitivity to longevity can be found by reviewing how probable it is that mortality will occur when the COI would produce an unacceptable return.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information contained in this material constitutes forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “target,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” or “believe,” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance or activities. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results or the actual performance of the AIRAM funds may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.
WARRANTIES & DISCLAIMERS
There are no warranties implied.
AIRAM is a registered investment adviser located in Chicago, Illinois. AIRAM may only transact business in those states in which it is registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. AIRAM’s website is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its advisory services, together with access to additional investment-related information, publications, and links. Accordingly, the publication of AIRAM’s website on the Internet should not be construed by any consumer and/or prospective client as AIRAM’s solicitation to effect or attempt to effect transactions in securities, or the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation, over the Internet. Any subsequent, direct communication by AIRAM with a prospective client shall be conducted by a representative that is either registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration in the state where the prospective client resides. For information pertaining to the registration status of AIRAM, please contact the state securities regulators for those states in which AIRAM maintains a registration filing. A copy of AIRAM’s current written disclosure statement discussing AIRAM’s business operations, services, and fees are available at the SEC’s investment adviser public information website – www.adviserinfo.sec.gov or from AIRAM upon written request. AIRAM does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to AIRAM’s website or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility therefor. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.
This website and information are provided for guidance and information purposes only. Investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed. Be sure to first consult with a qualified financial adviser and/or tax professional before implementing any strategy. This website and information are not intended to provide investment, tax, or legal advice.